• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

Rev. Sci. Instrum. 81, 041301 (2010); doi:10.1063/1.3400212 (8 pages)

Invited Article: High-pressure techniques for condensed matter physics at low temperature

Yejun Feng1,2, R. Jaramillo3, Jiyang Wang2, Yang Ren1, and T. F. Rosenbaum2

1The Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
2The James Franck Institute and Department of Physics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
3School of Engineering and Applied Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

View MapView Map

(Received 12 October 2009; accepted 27 March 2010; published online 20 April 2010)

Condensed matter experiments at high pressure accentuate the need for accurate pressure scales over a broad range of temperatures, as well as placing a premium on a homogeneous pressure environment. However, challenges remain in diamond anvil cell technology, including both the quality of various pressure transmitting media and the accuracy of secondary pressure scales at low temperature. We directly calibrate the ruby fluorescence R1 line shift with pressure at T = 4.5 K using high-resolution x-ray powder diffraction measurements of the silver lattice constant and its known equation of state up to P = 16 GPa. Our results reveal a ruby pressure scale at low temperatures that differs by 6% from the best available ruby scale at room T. We also use ruby fluorescence to characterize the pressure inhomogeneity and anisotropy in two representative and commonly used pressure media, helium and methanol:ethanol 4:1, under the same preparation conditions for pressures up to 20 GPa at T = 5 K. Contrary to the accepted wisdom, both media show equal levels of pressure inhomogeneity measured over the same area, with a consistent ΔP/P per unit area of ±1.8 %/(104μm2) from 0 to 20 GPa. The helium medium shows an essentially constant deviatoric stress of 0.021±0.011 GPa up to 16 GPa, while the methanol:ethanol mixture shows a similar level of anisotropy up to 10 GPa, above which the anisotropy increases. The quality of both pressure media is further examined under the more stringent requirements of single crystal x-ray diffraction at cryogenic temperature. For such experiments we conclude that the ratio of sample-to-pressure chamber volume is a critical parameter in maintaining sample quality at high pressure, and may affect the choice of pressure medium.

© 2010 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. CHARACTERIZATION OF PRESSURE MEDIA AT T = 5 K
  3. EXPERIMENTAL CHOICE OF PRESSURE MEDIA
  4. RUBY PRESSURE SCALE CALIBRATION AT T = 4.5 K
  5. CONCLUSIONS

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

  • 62.50.-p

    High-pressure effects in solids and liquids

  • 81.40.Vw

    Pressure treatment

  • 78.60.-b

    Other luminescence and radiative recombination

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN:

0034-6748 (print)  
1089-7623 (online)

For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.
    G. J. Piermarini, S. Block, and J. D. Barnett, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 5377 (1973)JAPIAU000044000012005377000001.

    J. H. Burnett, H. M. Cheong, and W. Paul, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 61, 3904 (1990)RSINAK000061000012003904000001.

    K. Takemura, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 662 (2001)JAPIAU000089000001000662000001.

    G. J. Piermarini, S. Block, J. D. Barnett, and R. A. Forman, J. Appl. Phys. 46, 2774 (1975)JAPIAU000046000006002774000001.

    N. J. Hess and D. Schiferl, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 1953 (1990)JAPIAU000068000005001953000001.

    E. F. Skelton, A. W. Webb, S. B. Qadri, S. A. Wolf, R. C. Lacoe, J. L. Feldman, W. T. Elam, E. R. Carpenter, and C. Y. Huang, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 55, 849 (1984)RSINAK000055000006000849000001.

    J. R. Neighbours and G. A. Alers, Phys. Rev. 111, 707 (1958).

    D. D. Ragan, R. Gustavsen, and D. Schiferl, J. Appl. Phys. 72, 5539 (1992)JAPIAU000072000012005539000001.

    X. A. Shen and Y. M. Gupta, Phys. Rev. B 48, 2929 (1993).

    A. L. Ruoff, J. Appl. Phys. 46, 1389 (1975)JAPIAU000046000003001389000001.

    A. K. Singh and T. Kenichi, J. Appl. Phys. 90, 3269 (2001)JAPIAU000090000007003269000001.

    Y. Feng, R. Jaramillo, G. Srajer, J. C. Lang, Z. Islam, M. S. Somayazulu, O. G. Shpyrko, J. J. Pluth, H. -k. Mao, E. D. Isaacs, G. Aeppli, and T. F. Rosenbaum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 137201 (2007).

    R. Jaramillo, Y. Feng, J. C. Lang, Z. Islam, G. Srajer, H. M. Rønnow, P. B. Littlewood, and T. F. Rosenbaum, Phys. Rev. B 77, 184418 (2008).

    T. J. Bastow and R. Street, Phys. Rev. 141, 510 (1966).

    J. P. Hill, G. Helgensen, and D. Gibbs, Phys. Rev. B 51, 10336 (1995).

    K. Syassen and W. B. Holzapfel, J. Appl. Phys. 49, 4427 (1978)JAPIAU000049000008004427000001.


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Figures (8)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)



Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close