• Volume/Page
  • Keyword
  • DOI
  • Citation
  • Advanced
   
 
 
 

Flickr Twitter UniPHY Group iResearch App Facebook

Author Select

FULL-TEXT OPTIONS:

Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79, 103101 (2008); http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2993980 (7 pages)

Development of high resolution Michelson interferometer for stable phase-locked ultrashort pulse pair generation

Takumi Okada1,2,3,4, Kazuhiro Komori2,3, Keishiro Goshima2,3, Shohgo Yamauchi2,3, Isao Morohashi2,3, Takeyoshi Sugaya2,3, Mutsuo Ogura2, and Noriaki Tsurumachi4

1Student Project Center, Tokai University, 1117 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa 259-1292, Japan
2National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8568, Japan
3CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST), 4-1-8 Honcho, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
4Faculty of Engineering, Kagawa University, 2217–20 Hayashicho, Takamatsu, Kagawa 761-0396, Japan

View MapView Map

(Received 10 August 2008; accepted 13 September 2008; published online 8 October 2008)

We developed a high resolution Michelson interferometer with a two-frequency He–Ne laser positioning system in order to stabilize the relative phase of a pulse pair. The control resolution corresponded to a 12 as time resolution or a phase of 1.5° at 900 nm. This high resolution Michelson interferometer can generate a phase-locked pulse pair either with a specific relative phase such as 0 or π radians or with an arbitrary phase. Coherent control of an InAs self-assembled quantum dot was demonstrated using the high resolution Michelson interferometer with a microspectroscopy system.

© 2008 American Institute of Physics

Article Outline

  1. INTRODUCTION
  2. HIGH RESOLUTION MICHELSON INTERFEROMETER
  3. COHERENT CONTROL OF InAs SELF-ASSEMBLED QUANTUM DOT
  4. CONCLUSION

KEYWORDS and PACS

PACS

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

0034-6748 (print)  
1089-7623 (online)

  1. K. Brunner, G. Abstreiter, G. Böhm, G. Tränkle, and G. Weimann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1138 (1994). [MEDLINE]
  2. D. Gammon, E. S. Snow, V. B. Shanabrook, D. S. Katzer, and D. Park, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3005 (1996). [MEDLINE]
  3. H. Kamada, J. Temmyo, M. Notomi, T. Furuta, and T. Tamamura, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 36, 4194 (1997).
  4. H. Kamada, H. Ando, J. Temmyo, and T. Tamamura, Phys. Rev. B 58, 16243 (1998). [ISI]
  5. X. Marie, P. L. Jeune, T. Amand, M. Brousseau, J. Barrau, and M. Paillard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3222 (1997).
  6. N. H. Bonadeo, J. Erland, D. Gammon, D. Park, D. S. Katzer, and D. G. Steel, Science 282, 1473 (1998). [MEDLINE]
  7. H. Kamada, H. Gotoh, J. Temmyo, T. Takagawara, and H. Ando, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 246401 (2001). [MEDLINE]
  8. Y. Toda, T. Sugimoto, M. Nishioka, and Y. Arakawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3887 (2000)APPLAB000076000026003887000001. [ISI]
  9. K. Komori, G. R. Hayes, B. Deveaud, X. L. Wang, M. Ogura, and M. Watanabe, Phys. Status Solidi A 190, 855 (2002). [ISI]
  10. K. Komori, G. Hayes, T. Okada, B. Deveaud, X. L. Wang, M. Ogura, and M. Watanabe, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 41, 2660 (2002).
  11. K. Komori, T. Sugaya, M. Watanabe, and T. Hidaka, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 39, 2347 (2000).
  12. T. Okada, K. Komori, K. Goshima, S. Yamauchi, I. Morohashi, T. Sugaya, O. Yamazaki, M. Ogura, and T. Hattori, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 43, 6093 (2004).
  13. K. Ohmori, H. Katsuki, H. Chiba, M. Honda, Y. Hagihara, K. Fujiwara, Y. Sato, and K. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 093002 (2006). [MEDLINE]
  14. K. Ohmori, Y. Sato, E. E. Nikitin, and S. A. Rice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 243003 (2003). [ISI] [MEDLINE]
  15. D. Leonard, M. Krishnamurthy, C. M. Reaves, S. P. Denbaars, and P. M. Petroff, Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 3203 (1993)APPLAB000063000023003203000001.
  16. M. Grundmann. J. Christen, N. N. Ledentsov, J. Böhrer, D. Bimberg, S. S. Ruvimov, P. Werner, U. Richter, U. Gösele, J. Heydenreich et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4043 (1995). [MEDLINE]
  17. Y. Toda, O. Moriwaki, M. Nishioka, and Y. Arakawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4114 (1999). [ISI]
  18. H. Htoon, D. Kulik, O. Baklenov, A. L. Homes, Jr., T. Takagahara, and C. K. Shih, Phys. Rev. B 63, 241303 (2001).


Figures (9) Tables (1)

Figures (click on thumbnails to view enlargements)

FIG.1
(a) High resolution Michelson interferometer with He–Ne laser positioning system. (b) Laser interferometer positioning system with He–Ne two-frequency laser.

FIG.1 Download High Resolution Image (.zip file) | Export Figure to PowerPoint

FIG.2
(a) Deviation of arm length difference without stabilization. (b) Deviation of arm length difference with stabilization. The resolution is 10 nm. (c) Deviation of arm length difference with stabilization. The resolution is 1.25 nm.

FIG.2 Download High Resolution Image (.zip file) | Export Figure to PowerPoint

FIG.3
(a) Difference between target position and actual position. (b) Position stability during feedback control with sudden environmental disturbance.

FIG.3 Download High Resolution Image (.zip file) | Export Figure to PowerPoint

FIG.4
(a) Autocorrelation of picosecond laser. (b) Expanded view of autocorrelation at 0 ps.

FIG.4 Download High Resolution Image (.zip file) | Export Figure to PowerPoint

FIG.5
Experimental setup of μPLE and coherent control.

FIG.5 Download High Resolution Image (.zip file) | Export Figure to PowerPoint

FIG.6
(a) SEM image of metal mask and cross section of sample. (b) Cross section of sample.

FIG.6 Download High Resolution Image (.zip file) | Export Figure to PowerPoint

FIG.7
μ-PL on single quantum dot.

FIG.7 Download High Resolution Image (.zip file) | Export Figure to PowerPoint

FIG.8
μ-PL excitation on single quantum dot.

FIG.8 Download High Resolution Image (.zip file) | Export Figure to PowerPoint

FIG.9
(a) Amplitude of oscillation in integrated PL as relative pulse delay. (b) Expanded view of oscillation at 2 ps.

FIG.9 Download High Resolution Image (.zip file) | Export Figure to PowerPoint

Tables

Table I. Characteristics of generated double pulse.

View Table


Close
Google Calendar
ADVERTISEMENT

close